Global Warming: The Unsettled Science or The Big Sell? – A Study Guide
We have been told again and again that 97% of scientists agree that planetary warming is man made and that “the science is settled.” Let us ask, “Exactly who surveyed all the scientists of world?”
Author Mark Steyn uncovered so much fraud and deception by climate change propagandists that he compiled an entire book on the matter entitled A Disgrace to the Profession. Here’s an excerpt that explains the shocking intellectual fraud behind the “97% of scientists” claim:
An opinion survey of earth scientists on global climate change was conducted by Margaret R K Zimmerman, MS, and published by the University of Illinois in 2008.
“…97 per cent of the world’s scientists supposedly believe in catastrophic anthropogenic global warming requiring massive government intervention. That percentage derives from a survey conducted for a thesis by M R K Zimmerman.
The “survey” was a two-question, online questionnaire sent to 10,257 earth scientists, of whom 3,146 responded.
Of the responding scientists, 96.2 per cent came from North America.
Only 6.2 per cent came from Canada. So the United States is over-represented even within that North American sample.
Nine per cent of US respondents are from California. So California is over-represented within not just the US sample: it has over twice as large a share of the sample as Europe, Asia, Australia, the Pacific, Latin America and Africa combined.
Of the ten per cent of non-US respondents, Canada has 62 per cent.
Not content with such a distorted sample, the researchers then selected 79 of their sample and declared them “experts.”
Of those 79 scientists, two were excluded from a second supplementary question. So 75 out of 77 made it through to the final round, and 97.4 per cent were found to agree with “the consensus”. That’s where the 97 per cent comes from.
So this is a very Michael Mann “reconstruction”: just as a couple of Californian bristlecones can determine the climate for a millennium, so a couple of dozen Californian scientists can determine the consensus of the world.
Nonetheless, the compilers also invited comments from respondents and published them in the appendices. In terms of specific scientific material, the hockey stick attracted three comments – one blandly positive, the other two not so much.
Wow, you mean the 97% consensus number comes from just 75 scientists that were hand-picked from an email survey?
Yep. Out of the hundreds of thousands of scientists in the world, only 75 of them were selected to “count” for the climate change survey that every mainstream media news organization quotes as FACT. – Mike Adams
(Also see this article on the Zimmeran crooked study.)
Meanwhile a real petition shows many thousands of scientist are “climate deniers.” According to Petitionproject.org, the Global Warming Petition Project, or the Oregon Petition has the signatures of “31,487 American scientists,” of which 9,029 stated they had Ph.D.s.
“Global warming is a non-problem…I say this to Obama: Excuse me, Mr. President, but you’re wrong. Dead wrong.”
– Dr. Ivar Giaever, Nobel-prize winner in Physics (1973), reported by Climate Depot, July 8, 2015
“The computer models just weren’t reliable. In fact, I’m not sure the whole thing isn’t crazy, this climate change.”
-Green Guru James Lovelock, who once predicted imminent destruction of the planet via global warming: (The Guardian, September 30, 2016)
“Global warming is one of the Rockefeller Globalists’ chief issues. Manipulating it entails convincing populations that a massive intervention is necessary to stave off the imminent collapse of all life on Earth. Therefore, sovereign nations must be eradicated. Political power and decision-making must flow from above, from “those who are wiser.”– Jon Rappoport
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.”
-Roth-efeller Club of Rome, 1968
“The threat of environmental crisis will be the ‘international disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order.”
– (Mikhail Gorbachev Quoted in a Special Report: The Wildlands Project Unleashes Its War On Mankind‘, by Marilyn Brannan, Associate Editor, Monetary & Economic Review, 1996, p.5)
“Analysis of ice cores shows that the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere follows [Does not precede!] the rise in temperatures very closely and lagged warmings by 800±400 years. During the glacial/ interglacial cycles the peaks of carbon dioxide concentration have never preceded the warmings. Therefore there is NO evidence that carbon dioxide is a major factor in the warming of the Earth now.”
– Habibullo Abdussamatov
For this reason, Post Gorbachev Russia will not take part in carbon credit scam in which a tax is placed on civilization in order to control who are the haves and who are the have nots.
Climate was once mostly altered by cloud seeding, but then electromagnetic methods were explored and now perfected. Virtually no meteorologists know about geoengineering, just as most geologists are blind about earthquake weapons. Wikipedia says geoengineering is hypothetical, but wikipedia is controlled disinformation.
“Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our efforts…” – April 1997, Defense Secretary William Cohen
Air Force Admits They Can Control Weather – HAARP … While HAARP and weather control has been called a conspiracy theory by the mainstream media…
Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 The Air Force Center for Strategy and Technology (CSAT) was established at The Air War College in 1997. Its purpose is to engage in long-term strategic thinking about … csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf
Extreme climate created by geoengineering backs up the perception of “climate change.” In reality climate always changes because nothing is static, The Earth’s orbit is not static, the sun’s radiation is not static, the position of sun in galaxy is not static. Even the axis of Earth’s rotation and position of poles is changing, as Inuit elders have noticed the axis is shifting. Does anyone think that CO2 is causing the axis to shift? The magnetic poles also shift. And then there is the inconvenient truth that Antarctic ice is increasing. Is that because of fossil fuels?
Sea ice surrounding Antarctica reached a new record high extent this year, covering more of the southern oceans than it has since scientists began a long-term …
49 NASA scientists have written letter disclaiming the science behind “Global Warming”. Also 74 NASA scientists killed in just two years, because they knew too much about the fake science, and/or too much about the secret second space program, paid for by the reader.
From DailyTech, we have still more evidence that any warming occurring on planet earth is coming from natural sources and is cyclic in nature–NOT from the evil capitalism that Al Gore, the UN politicians at the IPCC and other socialists love to blame.
From the article:
Now, a new research report from a surprising source may help to lay this skepticism to rest. A study from NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland looking at climate data over the past century has concluded that solar variation has made a significant impact on the Earth’s climate. The report concludes that evidence for climate changes based on solar radiation can be traced back as far as the Industrial Revolution.
Past research has shown that the sun goes through eleven year cycles. At the cycle’s peak, solar activity occurring near sunspots is particularly intense, basking the Earth in solar heat. According to Robert Cahalan, a climatologist at the Goddard Space Flight Center, “Right now, we are in between major ice ages, in a period that has been called the Holocene.”
If our media, culture and a large portion of the “scientific” community were really honest, it would be the worshippers of the religion of anthropogenic global warming who are called “skeptics,” wouldn’t it?
Because it is those pushing this silly theory that our puny SUVs and power plants are causing earth to warm up when the most obvious source of heat hangs over their head every single day.
AGW simply doesn’t pass the smell test. Nor does it line up with the objective data.
As this graph shows, solar activity has been cyclic in nature going back hundreds of years. Solar activity is also increasing, and we are coming out of the “Little Ice Age” of just a few hundred years ago. Of course the planet is warming–we’re coming out of a cold spell! The Maunder Minimum period of diminished solar activity coincided with the Little Ice Age when Europe and North America experienced bitterly cold winters.
About 1,000 years ago, Greenland was warm enough for the Vikings to colonize and grow vineyards. Today Greenland is almost entirely covered in ice. Tell me: is the earth warmer today than it was 1,000 years ago? Did they have SUVs and coal power plants in the days of the Vikings? This isn’t tough to figure out, people.
The only thing tough about the global warming debate is trying to get the facts to match the socialist agenda of the AGW proponents. Try as they might, they just can’t do it, and more and more people are starting to see that.
Things like cyclic solar data, warming occurring on other planets such as Mars and Jupiter just don’t line up with the suppositions of the AGW worshippers. They craft all manner of complex calculations and “what ifs,” but in the end the best they can do is say things like, “Well, we can’t prove it now, but by the time we can, it’ll be too late.”
And we’re supposed to watch our electric bills go up 40% and see our economy devastated on what-ifs and a bunch of garbage that not only doesn’t match the evidence but doesn’t even pass the smell test?
I’m not as gullible as these shysters seem to think I am, and I don’t believe most of the American people are either.
A Global Warming Study Guide…
Before beginning the study guide, I suggest that reader should become familiar with the fact that science is no longer objective or evidence based.
2 minute video, click on image
“It has been suggested, with evidence, that NOAA has been a little less than forthcoming with temperature data this year ahead of all these big UN meetings addressing Agenda 21 and climate change. I’m sorry, did I say “a little less than forthcoming”? If this is true, I meant to say a bunch of big fat liars.
“It has been announced that more than 190 countries are set to meet in Paris in December to see about a “new global agreement on climate change aimed at reducing global greenhouse gas emissions and thus avoiding the threat of dangerous climate change” since the current “commitments” on emissions run out in five years.
“In its report on this, The Guardian answers the question “Why has nobody thought of getting a global agreement on this before now?” by saying they’ve been trying to get something going in this area for 20 years now at least but only in the last two decades has “science” consistently pointed in one direction which is that greenhouse gas emissions from industry and fossil fuels are causing global temps to rise.
“Ignore a decades-long cooling period. Ignore Climategate — an organized climate change conspiracy and collusion in exaggerating warming data out of the Climate Research Unit at University of East Anglia — or that NOAA tried to erase the “pause” in warming in 1998 by saying it was just “improperly adjusted data”, for a moment.
“Also ignore any anomalies that could be caused by clandestine solar radiation management aka geoengineering (spraying of particulates to reduce incoming sunlight) as has been advocated in UN IPCC reports.”
1. Other planets warming, and that is because of fossil fuels?
2. Scientists rip fake global warming data
Maurice Strong, the man who introduced the idea of “global warming” at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, set the initial charge to the IPCC in a way that completely ignored anything about potential impacts of the Sun, choosing to focus only on potential human causes — Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW). Strong, a long time agent of the Rockefeller cartel, had a clear directive to organize human efforts against a common enemy, and that enemy was chosen, by elites in the Club of Rome (founded by David Rockefeller), to be “global warming.” This was spelled out in their document, Limits to Growth, in 1972.
Al Gore did not mention that higher resolution studies of the same ice cores reveal that temperature changes came first, and then were followed by changes in CO2. CO2 increase never proceeds global warming. (Yes, we are polluting atmosphere and may be causing ocean acidification, however, fossil fuels are not warming up Jupiter and Mars.) (Mudelsee, 2001; Clark, 2003; Vakulenko et al., 2004) http://www.globalwarminghoax.com/news.php?extend.11
Gore is Illuminati Bloodline – intermarriage with Rothschild
Climate Change: The Government’s Best Revenue Stream Since War and Taxes
“The Fabian Society was in close touch with the Rothschilds both directly and through go-betweens like Lord Arthur Balfour. “
Headed by Tony Blair, Fabians now dominate the entire British government.
Fabians and sustainable development
Illuminati Leonardo Decaprio’s popularity is used to help bring One World Government. His specialty as a messenger of “peace” is “climate change.”
Note: All celebrities are in the all-seeing-eye club, or we would have never heard of them. The star makers then use the puppets. Just because a photo of someone doing the club rituals hasn’t surfaced, does not mean that that celebrity is free and independent. They are ALL in club or they wouldn’t get the contracts. And as we are coming to understand, the exact same vetting occurs in politics, world wide. Think ‘central banks.’
4. Chemtrails and extreme weather
For this reason, the spiritual road has been masked, often by those who create churches and temples. We are supposed to stay slobbering for more stuff. The elite mask the spiritual path which would take us away from dependency. The elite need dependent slaves. In our times, we are are dumbed down by promiscuity and government trafficked drugs to be addicts of sensation, not seekers of inner refinement.
I regard Foster Gamble who wrote essay below, as a sweet hearted globalist who always talks about “humanity” instead of diverse re-localization. Globalists are not just the top of pyramid, they include anyone who thinks there are global answers. Rather, all such thoughts need to be abandoned, and exchanged for what will survive, which is local answers.
As a globalist, Gamble is committed to one world government to be ruled by enlightened people like himself, who also happen to be into high consumption. Dr. Steven Greer has same vain disease. So does Richard Heinberg and Helena Norberg-Hodge. The promise of more candy is precisely why Gamble’s work with “Thrive” and Greer’s work with “Disclosure” are popular. Foster Gamble’s homepage has 250k Facebook likes. Those who want to keep all their toys, love him. But Gamble and the followers of his “movement” are mistaken.
In order for the ancient biosphere (which includes millions of other species) to thrive, human population must return to to the level of consumption we had 500 years ago. There is no argument with this. This is what must happen and the Earth will make sure that is does happen, because she is finite material being. Resource depletion is here.
Modern, high consumption, industrial “man” is burning out the ancient planet as we strip mine and pollute it. Therefore we must consider what worked before this industrial insanity began. Ancient lifestyle worked, modern lifestyle does not. There is no way to drive a hot rod slowly. There is no way to live naturally and also be in a golf club.
How many deep ecologists live like the kings of old? Answer… almost all.
Foster Gamble, Steven Greer and Peter Joseph of Zeitgeist Movement, expose themselves as vain spoiled globalists, who think humans are masters of their own destiny. Not true. We are just one member species in an ecologic family. They believe that we elite humans will control and maintain a “thriving” planet, where billions will use high tech, miraculously without impact. After messing up everything, we will come up with a new invention, a new bandaid, rather than realize the direction we were headed for was simply wrong. There is no utopia ahead and we have destroyed our planet in trying to get to never never land.
Gamble, Greer, and Joseph, and almost every reader, are simply inebriated by the high fashion lifestyle. Any and every piece of industrial product in your home, your car, your work place, in your view as you look in any direction, came to exist by permanently destroying a part of the ancient planet and murdering the ecology that once lived there. The soil will require hundreds of thousands of years to come back. So will the forests. So will the wetlands. So will the reefs. The water tables may never be pure again. The polluted water tables from mining and industry and “science” will eventually pollute the oceans. Are you still fascinated by your “smart” phone?
Anyone reading this who does not have a garden is lost in this industrial bubble also. We have forgotten what natural living is. Natural living is hearsay to most of us, a rumor. We are so habituated, that though we all know something is wrong, very few are willing to change their BEHAVIOR.
All of us have a huge blind spot. Wealth breeds blindness. As an alternative to “Thrive”, please see this link and I suggest it be taken seriously. What I mean is, your life will probably depend on it. www.transitionus.org
And let’s not worry about collapse. Believe it or not, the indigenous lifestyle can be only one generation away as proven here.
Let’s Talk for Real — About Humans and Climate Change
http://www.thrivemovement.com/lets-talk-for-real-about-humans-and-climate-change.blog Sat, 17 Oct 2015 06:00:00 PDT By Foster Gamble