November 2015

 I appreciate this action pointed out in interview “The lower middle classes … are already moving out of the Parisian suburbs and farther into the countryside.” When crisis is upon us, those who head for the hills are wise, in my opinion.   In article, emphasis is mine and [comments]. This article gives some background behind what Germany is now facing with one million immigrants in 2015, and Merkel starting to sag in popularity – Ray  . . French Philosopher Finkielkraut: ‘There Is a Clash of Civilizations’ Interview Conducted by Mathieu von Rohr and Romain Leick  – Dec 6 2013 http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/interview-french-philosopher-finkielkraut-on-muslims-and-integration-a-937404.html French society is under threat, argues philosopher Alain Finkielkraut in a controversial new book. The conservative spoke to SPIEGEL about what he sees as the failure of multiculturalism and the need for better integration of Muslim immigrants. Alain Finkielkraut is one of France’s most controversial essayists. His new book, “L’Identité Malheureuse” (“The Unhappy Identity,” Éditions Stock ), has been the subject of heated debate. It comes at a time when France finds itself in the midst of an identity crisis. But rather than framing things from a social or political perspective, Finkielkraut explores what he sees as a hostile confrontation between indigenous French people and immigrants. He was interviewed in his Parisian apartment on the Left Bank. SPIEGEL: Mr. Finkielkraut, are you unhappy with today’s France? Finkielkraut: I am pained to see that the French mode of European civilization is threatened. France is in the process of transforming into a…

  This is some correspondence.  The earlier is at bottom.   Marilyn, Let’s remember that this conversation started with a denial of the present doom that the world is facing. Because a newly invented machine can measure something, doesn’t mean it has reality or value. Did these things exist two hundred years ago? No. They are belief systemsbased on machine measurements.   I suppose you think science is real, but it is not, it is classification based on measurements by machines. When the machines change, the “reality” changes but it was not reality, it was a set of beliefs. If you identify a “field” as simply being a model based on goals of the researchers, (the machines are always invented to measure some aspect)  the “field” is just another artificial classification. For example, there is no such thing as CO2.  Many things are only real because we think they are. If we empty of all that, we get to what really is, which cannot be classified or described. Follow the money.  Obviously, the “Global Consciousness Project”  and the others you listed, exist to establish one world spirituality, culture,and government.  “We are all one”  But who cares?  Answer, the globalists, who fund this stuff.  “We are all one. Submit to the oneness.  We are all one. Submit to the oneness.  We are all one. Submit to the oneness.”  Any study that is “global” is a globalist project, obviously. In fact, no ecosystem is global.  The tropics are not the arctic.  Nor is…

The Global Warming idea is a creation of The Club of Rome, described as a crisis think-tank which specializes in crisis creation. The main purpose of this think tank was to formulate a crisis ‘to unite the world and condition us to the idea of global solutions for local problems.” It’s members, like The Bilderberg Group, don’t have an altruistic bone in them. In a document called The First Global Revolution, authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider on Pg. 104 & 105 it stated: “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came us with the idea that pollution, the threat of global-warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fill the bill.  In reality, as reported by Russian scientist Habibullo Abdussamatov  … ” Analysis of ice cores shows that the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere follows the rise in temperatures very closely and lagged warmings by 800±400 years. During the glacial/interglacial cycles the peaks of carbon dioxide concentration have never preceded the warmings. Therefore there is no evidence that carbon dioxide is a major factor in the warming of the Earth now.”  – Habibullo Abdussamatov There is a second article below this first one. How Skeptical Science maintains the 97% Consensus fallacy by Kevin Marshall,  June  5,  2014 http://manicbeancounter.com/2014/06/05/how-skeptical-science-maintains-the-97-consensus-fallacy/ Richard Tol has at last published a rebuttal of the Cook et al 97% consensus paper. So naturally Skeptical Science, run by John Cook publishes a rebuttal by Dana Nuccitelli. It is cross-posted at the Guardian…