was successfully added to your cart.

From Brzezinski to Lakota, the Religion of “Progress”

By February 7, 2016 True Sustainability

To Patrick Wood,
bcc  friends

Hi Pat,

I have started your book. (Technocracy Rising) You and I completely agree and completely disagree, which is fine. Please take a close look at this image below and save this image, okay?  We disagree about man and nature on your Page 7, but I think you can now agree with me, that with this book cover, we see that Brzezinski is an Illuminati puppet, and Pat, I don’t think he wrote anything alone, and was not discovered by Rockefeller. Brzezinski got a job at Columbia because he was placed there. And he was then placed by Rockefeller for Trilateral Commission. Lets remember that Kissinger worked for ten years for Nelson Rockefeller before he was placed in Nixon administration.

It is same with Mein Kampf.  Hitler didn’t write it.  He was illegitimate grandson of Salomon Rothschild. He was placed. And everything we know about Hitler, like Obama, is spun history.  You probably know about Obama as third generation CIA.

Penguin picked up the book because Penguin is controlled and Penguin went with the cover. Brzezinski most likely did not design the cover.  I am saying that the only reason (before the internet) that we ever heard of anyone is because they were backed.

Lipstick and War Crimes

I’m saying Brzezinski is a front man and technocracy is a part of something bigger. He was trusted with Trilateral Commission not just because he had a brain, but because he had no heart, and that was because he was groomed. It is very likely that he was CIA handler for Obama where Obama never really studied. Obama was too busy working for CIA in Pakistan and other places.

Technocracy is a philosophical-paradigm extension of technology itself, but where did the technology come from?  This goes very deep now.

Can we agree that Sanskrit was a channeled language, that Judaism and Islam are channeled religions, and that the pyramids of Giza were not the invention of stone age people. There is another source for all this.

I will give you some clues now, which you won’t find palatable but I know what I know. Benjamin Franklin published his paper on electricity in 1751. Electricity is the most environmentally destructive development ever. Electricity instantly empowers over extraction and over consumption.  (The New World Order blueprint is to reign in out of control civilization with depopulation and Smart Cities.) Franklin was a Freemason as were almost all the founding fathers. This next you will have a hard time swallowing….. On the string of Franklin’s lineage, a more recent incarnation was the Indian guru Yogananda. The next incarnation is alive now, Dr. Steven Greer of the Center for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence.  I confirmed this when I met Greer.  That is, we talked about it.  It was true.  Both Greer and Yogananda are under same non-terrestrial “spiritual” guide/guru/being called Babaji.  Greer wants “free energy”.  This would be the ultimate excuse for Big Brother, the New World Order, to regulate everything. In other words, Franklin, Yogananda, and Greer are all globalists. A globalist destroys local diversity. Indigenous people are crushed because they are not part of the globalist religion of “progress.”

Free energy (over unity devices) means free unlimited extraction and collapse, OR it means total regulation.

Please let me repeat that one…   Free energy means free extraction means total regulation.

“Oh, but in utopia, people will be nice and spiritual. Technology can be used nicely.”  That is always the response of the mind programmed “progress” cult.  We are moving toward an impossible utopia, but, you are dumbed down so just keep marching. Technology depends on trashing someone else’s homeland. Technology is not amoral, it is immoral. Someone else’s backyard gets destroyed.  Only because this crime is hidden, can the cult of progress continue. Expose Monsanto, and the crime can end. Expose Google “singularity”, and the crime of total consolidation can end.

The dots above, connect that some off dimension/planet source wants to convert Earth for the most efficient extraction. And we industrial addicts are the slaves who will make it happen. These are huge leaps of understanding, but I am showing you what I found and I follow intuitive currents, and I detected Greer’s last life was Yogananda, and went all the way to California from Hawaii and confirmed it, and I detect Franklin was on that line also. I know what I know. Technocracy and the Freemason/Illuminati/Rothschild/New Age club (going all the way back to Moses and Sanskrit and Pyramids) are the same club.

What has driven me is the pain of losing a planet.

For monotheists, industrialists, consumers, and technocrats, (all in the same nexus) the Earth doesn’t matter because it is “just matter.” This idea is the “progress” cult, starting from before Moses and his dominion and chosen people garbage.  These are huge leaps but stick with me please. Who really stands up to this shit!

Now I would like you to please read the speech by Russell Means 1980, and take it very seriously please. It is long but very worthwhile and this will explain our disagreements on your page 7.

Your books are doing well, with 81 positive reviews on Amazon. I have not starting promoting my books yet.  This speech will be in my Vol. 3 of Lipstick and War Crimes Series, coming out soon.

Friday, Feb 5, 2016 5:47 AM UTC In debate, Hillary Clinton boasted that she is supported by Henry Kissinger, accused war criminal who oversaw policies that …

Speech – “For The World to Live Europe Must Die” – Russell Means
[cml_media_alt id='5399']Russell Means[/cml_media_alt]

The following speech was given by Russell Means of the Oglala Lakota in July 1980 before several thousand people who had assembled from all over the world for the Black Hills International Survival Gathering, in the Black Hills of South Dakota. Only 80 years before he was born, his people were living their ancient and sustainable lifestyle and hunting buffalo. Readers of Vol. 1 and 2 of Lipstick and War Crimes series will understand that the Rothschilds have controlled Europe since Napoleon. Russell Means did not have the internet to uncover what we know now. We now know that the British Empire and colonialism was a Rothschild business model in the last two centuries. Here, Russell Means ties in the arrogance of monotheism (only my way is true) which is manifesting today as total control through technocracy. (Technocracyinc.org- “- founded in 1933. Developing a new system for government; a social structure that will prevent poverty, corruption and an imbalance in the distribution of wealth and resources.” – Total control, total rationing, to bring “Peace on Earth.”  The alternative to monotheism (only my way is true)  is the organic understanding “All My Relations” which Russel Means invokes.)

Russell Means… July 1, 1980, Black Hills International Survival Gathering

“The only possible opening for a statement of this kind is that I detest writing. The process itself epitomizes the European concept of “legitimate” thinking; what is written has an importance that is denied the spoken. My culture, the Lakota culture, has an oral tradition, so I ordinarily reject writing. It is one of the white world’s ways of destroying the cultures of non-European peoples, the imposing of an abstraction over the spoken relationship of a people.

“So what you read here is not what I have written. It is what I have said and someone else has written down. I will allow this because it seems that the only way to communicate with the white world is through the dead, dry leaves of a book. I don’t really care whether my words reach whites or not. They have already demonstrated through their history that they cannot hear, cannot see; they can only read (of course, there are exceptions, but the exceptions only prove the rule). I’m more concerned with the American Indian people, students and others, who have begun to be absorbed into the white world through universities and other institutions. But even then it’s a marginal sort of concern. It’s very possible to grow into a red face with a white mind; and if that’s a person’s individual choice, so be it, but I have no use for them. This is part of the process of cultural genocide being waged by Europeans against American Indian peoples’ today. My concern is with those American Indians who choose to resist this genocide, but may be confused as to how to proceed.

“(You notice I use the term American Indian rather than Native American or Native indigenous people or Amerindian when referring to my people.) There has been some controversy about such terms, and frankly, at this point, I find it absurd. Primarily it seems that American Indian is being rejected as European in origin — which is true. But all the above terms are European in origin; the only non-European way is to speak of Lakota — or, more precisely, of Oglala, Brule, et. — and of the Dineh, the Miccousukee, and all the rest of the several hundred correct tribal names. There is also some confusion about the word Indian, a mistaken belief that it refers somehow to the country, India. When Columbus washed up on the beach in the Caribbean, he was not looking for a country called India. Europeans were calling that country Hindustan in 1492. Look it up on the old maps. Columbus called the tribal people he met “Indio,” from the Italian in dio, meaning “in God.”)

“It takes a strong effort on the part of each American Indian not to become Europeanized. The strength for this effort can only come from the traditional ways, the traditional values that our elders retain. It must come from the hoop, the four directions, the relations: it cannot come from the pages of a book or a thousand books. No European can ever teach a Lakota to be Lakota, a Hopi to be Hopi. A master’s degree in “Indian Studies” or in “education” or in anything else cannot make a person into a human being or provide knowledge into the traditional ways. It can only make you into a mental European, an outsider.

“I should be clear about something here, because there seems to be some confusion about it. When I speak of Europeans or mental Europeans, I’m not allowing for false distinctions. I’m not saying that on the one hand there are the by-products of a few thousand years of genocidal, reactionary European intellectual development which is bad; and on the other hand there is some new revolutionary intellectual development which is good. I’m referring here to the so-called theories of Marxism and anarchism and “leftism” in general. I don’t believe these theories can be separated from the rest of the European intellectual tradition. It’s really just the same old song.

The process began much earlier. Newton, for example, “revolutionized” physics and the so-called natural science by reducing the physical universe to a linear mathematical equation. Descartes did the same thing with culture. John Locke did it with politics, and Adam Smith did it with economics. Each one of these “thinkers” took a piece of the spirituality of human existence and converted it into a code, an abstraction. They picked up where Christianity ended: they “secularized” Christian religion, as the “scholars” like to say — and in doing so they made Europe more able and ready to act as an expansionist culture. Each of these intellectual revolutions served to abstract the European mentality even further, to remove the wonderful complexity and spirituality from the universe and replace it with a logical sequence: one, two, three. Answer!

This is what has come to be termed “efficiency” in the European mind. Whatever is mechanical is perfect; whatever seems to work at the moment — that is, proves the mechanical model to be the right one — is considered correct, even when it is clearly untrue. This is why “truth” changes so fast in the European mind; the answers which result from such a process are only stopgaps, only temporary, and must be continuously discarded in favor of new stopgaps which support the mechanical models and keep them (the models) alive.

Hegel and Marx [A paid Rothschild front man – Vol. 2] were heirs to the thinking of Newton, Descartes, Locke and Smith. Hegel finished the process of secularizing theology — and that is put in his own terms — he secularized the religious thinking through which Europe understood the universe. Then Marx put Hegel’s philosophy in terms of “materialism,” which is to say that Marx de-spiritualized Hegel’s work altogether. Again, this is in Marx’ own terms. And this is now seen as the future revolutionary potential of Europe. Europeans may see this as revolutionary, But American Indians see it simply as still more of that same old European conflict between being and gaining. The intellectual roots of a new Marxist form of European imperialism lie in Marx’ — and his followers’ — links to the tradition of Newton, Hegel, and the others.

Being is a spiritual proposition. Gaining is a material act. Traditionally, American Indians have always attempted to be the best people they could. Part of that spiritual process was and is to give away wealth, to discard wealth in order not to gain. Material gain is an indicator of false status among traditional people, while it is “proof that the system works” to Europeans. Clearly, there are two completely opposing views at issue here, and Marxism is very far over to the other side from the American Indian view. But let’s look at a major implication of this; it is not merely an intellectual debate.

The European [Rothschild] materialist tradition of de-spiritualizing the universe is very similar to the mental process which goes into dehumanizing another person. And who seems most expert at dehumanizing other people? And why? Soldiers who have seen a lot of combat learn to do this to the enemy before going back into combat. Murderers do it before going out to commit murder. Nazi SS guards [created by Rothschilds, funded by Wall Street] did it to concentration camp inmates. Cops do it. Corporation leaders do it to the workers they send into uranium mines and steel mills. Politicians do it to everyone in sight. And what the process has in common for each group doing the dehumanizing is that it makes it all right to kill and otherwise destroy other people. One of the Christian commandments says, “Thou shalt not kill,” at least not humans, so the trick is to mentally convert the victims into nonhumans. Then you can proclaim violation of your own commandment as a virtue.

In terms of the de-spiritualization of the universe, the mental process works so that it become virtuous to destroy the planet. Terms like “progress” and “development” are used as cover words here, the way victory and freedom are used to justify butchery in the dehumanization process. For example, a real-estate speculator may refer to “developing” a parcel of ground by opening a gravel quarry; development here means total, permanent destruction, with the earth itself removed. But European logic has gained a few tons of gravel with which more land can be “developed” through the construction of road beds. Ultimately, the whole universe is open — in the European view — to this sort of insanity.

Most important here, perhaps, is the fact that Europeans feel no sense of loss in this. After all, their philosophers have de-spiritualized reality, so there is no satisfaction (for them) to be gained in simply observing the wonder of a mountain or a lake or a people in being. No, satisfaction is measured in terms of gaining material. So the mountain becomes gravel, and the lake becomes coolant for a factory, and the people are rounded up for processing through the indoctrination mills Europeans like to call schools.

But each new piece of that “progress” ups the ante out in the real world. Take fuel for the industrial machine as an example. Little more than two centuries ago, nearly everyone used wood — a replenishable, natural item — as fuel for the very human needs of cooking and staying warm. Along came the Industrial Revolution and coal became the dominant fuel, as production became the social imperative for Europe. Pollution began to become a problem in the cities, and the earth was ripped open to provide coal whereas wood had simply been gathered or harvested at no great expense to the environment. Later, oil became the major fuel, as the technology of production was perfected through a series of scientific “revolutions.” Pollution increased dramatically, and nobody yet knows what the environmental costs of pumping all that oil out of the ground will really be in the long run. Now there’s an “energy crisis,” and uranium is becoming the dominant fuel.

Capitalists, at least, can be relied upon to develop uranium as fuel only at the rate at which they can show a good profit. That’s their ethic, and maybe that will buy some time. Marxists, on the other hand, can be relied upon to develop uranium fuel as rapidly as possible simply because it’s the most “efficient” production fuel available. That’s their ethic, and I fail to see where it’s preferable. Like I said, Marxism is right smack in the middle of the European tradition. It’s the same old song.

[Capitalists and Communists were both created by the Rothschilds to work their plan of divide and conquer and total destabilization, thesis-antithesis>synthesis, to create their high tech New World Order, built on the destruction of everything organic <>spiritual.  Technocracy makes technology a religion because value is placed on speed of extraction.]

There’s a rule of thumb that can be applied here. You cannot judge the real nature of a revolutionary doctrine on the basis of the changes it proposed to make within the European power structure and society. You can only judge it by the effect it will have on non-European peoples. [Whenever entitled rich nations people talk about their deity “progress,” they willfully deny the collateral damage.] This is because every revolution in European history has served to reinforce Europe’s [Rothschild] tendencies and abilities to export destruction to other peoples, other cultures and the environment itself. I defy anyone to point out an example where this is not true.

So now we, as American Indian people, are asked to believe that a “new” European revolutionary doctrine such as Marxism will reverse the negative effect of European history on us. European power relations are to be adjusted once again, and that’s supposed to make things better for all of us. But what does this really mean?

Right now, today, we who live on the Pine Ridge Reservation are living in what white society has designated a “National Sacrifice Area.” What this means is that we have a lot of uranium deposits here, and white culture (not us) needs this uranium as energy production material. The cheapest, most efficient way for industry to extract and deal with the processing of this uranium is to dump the waste by-products right here at the digging sites. Right here where we live. This waste is radioactive and will make the entire region uninhabitable forever. This is considered by industry, and by the white society that created this industry, to be an “acceptable” price to pay for energy resource development. Along the way they also plan to drain the water table under this part of South Dakota as part of the industrial process, so the region becomes doubly uninhabitable. The same sort of thing is happening. The same sort of thing is happening down in the land of the Navajo and Hopi, up in the land of the Northern Cheyenne and Crow, and elsewhere. Thirty percent of the coal in the West and half of the uranium deposits in the United States have been found to lie under reservation land, so there is no way this can be called a minor issue.

We are resisting being turned into a National Sacrifice Area. We are resisting being turned into a national sacrifice people. The costs of this industrial process are not acceptable to us. It is genocide to dig uranium here and draw the water table — no more, no less.

Now let’s suppose that in our resistance to extermination we begin to seek allies (we have).

Let’s suppose further that we were to take revolutionary Marxism at its word: that it intends nothing less than the complete overthrow of the European capitalist order which has presented this threat to our very existence. This would seem to be a natural alliance for American Indian people to enter into. After all, as the Marxists say, it is the capitalists who set us up to be a national sacrifice. This is true as far as it goes.

But, as I’ve tried to point out, this very “truth” is deceptive. Revolutionary Marxism is committed to even further perpetuation and perfection of the very industrial process which is destroying us all. It offers only to “redistribute” the results — the money, maybe — of this industrialization to a wider section of the population. It offers to take wealth from the capitalists and pass it around; but in order to do so, Marxism must maintain the industrial system. Once again, the power relations with European society will have to be altered, but once again the effects upon American Indian peoples here and non-Europeans elsewhere will remain the same. This much the same as when power was redistributed from the church to private business during the so-called bourgeois revolution. European society changed a bit, at least superficially, but its conduct toward non-Europeans continued as before. You can see what the American Revolution of 1776 did for American Indians! It’s the same old song.

Revolutionary Marxism, like industrial society in other forms, seeks to “rationalize” all people in relation to industry — maximum industry, maximum production. It is a materialist doctrine that despises the American Indian spiritual tradition, out cultures, our lifeways.  [Notice how he states it as plural] Marx himself called us “pre-capitalists” and “primitive.” Pre-capitalist simply means that, in his view, we would eventually discover capitalism and become capitalists; we have always been economically retarded in Marxist terms. The only manner in which American Indian people could participate in a Marxist revolution would be to join the industrial system, to become factory workers, or “proletarians,” as Marx called them. The man was very clear about the fact that his revolution could occur only through the struggle of the proletariat, that the existence of a massive industrial system is a precondition of a successful Marxist society.

I think there is a problem with language here. Christians, capitalists, Marxists… All of them have been revolutionary in their own minds, but none of them really means revolution. What they really mean is a continuation. They do what they do in order that European [Rothschild] culture can continue to exist and develop [globalize and monopolize] according to its needs.

So, in order for us to really join forces with Marxism, we American Indians would have to accept the national sacrifice of our homeland; we would have to commit cultural suicide and become industrialized and Europeanized.

At this point, I’ve got to stop and ask myself whether I’m being too harsh. Marxism [created by Rothschilds] has something of a history. Does this history bear out my observations? I look to the process of industrialization in the Soviet Union since 1920 and I see that these Marxists have done what it took the English Industrial Revolution 300 years to do; and the Marxists did it in 60 years!

I see that the territory of the USSR used to contain a number of tribal peoples and they have been crushed to make way for the factories. The Soviets refer to this as “the National Question,” the question of whether the tribal peoples had a right to exist as people; and they decided the tribal peoples were an acceptable sacrifice to industrial needs. I look to China and I see the same thing. I look to Vietnam and I see Marxists imposing an industrial order and rooting out the indigenous tribal mountain people.

I hear a leading Soviet scientist saying that when the uranium is exhausted, then alternatives will be found. I see the Vietnamese taking over a nuclear power plant abandoned by the U.S. military. Have they dismantled and destroyed it? No, they are using it. I see China exploding nuclear bombs, developing nuclear reactors, and preparing a space program in order to colonize and exploit the planets the same as the Europeans colonized and exploited this hemisphere. It’s the same old song, but maybe with a faster tempo this time.

The statement of the Soviet scientist’s is very interesting. Does he know what this alternative energy source will be? No, he simply has faith. Science will find a way. I hear revolutionary Marxists saying that the destruction of the environment, pollution, and radiation will be controlled. And I see them act on their words. Do they know how these things will be controlled? No, they simply have faith. “Science will find a way.”

[Almost everyone who reads these words, buys the mind control programming. This is technocracy as the new religion. Another word for technocracy is “progress.”]

Industrialization is fine and necessary.” How do they know this? Faith. “Science will find a way.”

Faith of this sort has always been known in Europe as religion. Science has become the new European religion [technological “dominion”] for both capitalists and Marxists; they are truly inseparable; they are part and parcel of the same culture. So, in both theory and practice, Marxism demands that non-European peoples give up their values, their traditions, their cultural experience altogether. We will all be industrialized science addicts [glued to a smart phone] in a Marxist society.

I do not believe that capitalism itself is really responsible for the situation in which American Indians have been declared a national sacrifice. No, it is the European tradition; European culture itself is responsible. Marxism is just the latest continuation of this tradition, not a solution to it. To ally with Marxism is to ally with the very same forces that declare us an acceptable cost.

There is another way. There is the traditional Lakota way and the ways of the other American Indian peoples. It is the way that knows that humans do not have the right to degrade Mother Earth, that there are forces beyond anything the European mind has conceived, that humans must be in harmony with All Relations or the Relations will eventually eliminate the disharmony.

A lopsided emphasis on humans by humans — the European’s arrogance of acting as though they were beyond the nature of All Related things — can only result in a total disharmony and a readjustment which cuts arrogant humans down to size, gives them a taste of that reality beyond their grasp or control and restores the harmony. There is no need for a revolutionary theory to bring this about; it’s beyond human control. The natural peoples of this planet know this and so they do not theorize about it. Theory is an abstract; our knowledge is real.

Distilled to it’s basic terms, European faith — including the new faith in science — equals a belief that man is God.  [Technocracy]

Europe has always sought a Messiah, whether that be the man Jesus Christ or the man Karl Marx or the man Albert Einstein. American Indians know this to be truly absurd. Humans are the weakest of all creatures, so weak that other creatures are willing to give up their flesh that we may live. Humans are able to survive only though the exercise of rationality since they lack the abilities of other creatures to gain food through the use of fang and claw.

But rationality is a curse since it can cause human beings to forget the natural order of things in ways other creatures do not. A wolf never forgets his or her place in the natural order. American Indians can. Europeans almost always do. We pray our thanks to the deer, our relations, for allowing us their flesh to eat; Europeans simply take the flesh for granted and consider the deer inferior. After all, Europeans consider themselves godlike in their rationalism and science. God is the Supreme Being; all else must be inferior.

[This is the mono-theism of the Bible, and we must overturn this criminal mind of the channeled entity that Moses channeled. We cannot be colonized by his megalomania.]

All European tradition, Marxism included, has conspired to defy the natural order of things. Mother Earth has been abused, the powers have been abused, and this cannot go on forever. No theory can alter that simple fact. Mother Earth will retaliate, the whole environment will retaliate, and the abusers will be eliminated. Things will come full circle, back to where they started. That’s revolution. And that’s a prophecy of my people, of the Hopi people and of other correct peoples.

[“The meek shall inherit the Earth” – Jesus]

American Indians have been trying to explain this to Europeans for centuries. But, as I said earlier, Europeans have proven themselves unable to hear. The natural order will win out, and the offenders will die out, the way deer die when they offend the harmony by over-populating a given region. It’s only a matter of time until what Europeans call “a major catastrophe of global proportions” will occur. It is the role of American Indian peoples, the role of all natural beings, to survive. A part of our survival is to resist. We resist not to overthrow a government or to take political power, but because it is natural to resist extermination, to survive. We don’t want power over white institutions; we want white institutions to disappear. That’s revolution.

American Indians are still in touch with these realities — the prophecies, the traditions of our ancestors. We learn from the elders, from nature, from the powers. And when the catastrophe is over, we American Indian people will survive; harmony will be reestablished. That’s revolution.

At this point, perhaps I should be very clear about another matter, one which should already be clear as a result of what I’ve said. But confusion breeds easily these days, so I want to hammer home this point. When I use the term “European,” I’m not referring to a skin color or a particular genetic structure. What I’m referring to is a mind-set, a worldview that is a product of the development of European culture. Peoples are not genetically encoded to hold this outlook, they are acculturated to hold it. The same is true for American Indians or for the members of any other culture.

It is possible for an American Indian to share European values, a European worldview. We have a term for these people; we call them “apples” — red on the outside (genetics) and white on the inside (their values). Other groups have similar terms: Blacks have their “oreos;” Hispanics have “coconuts” and so on. And, as I said before, there are exceptions to the white norm: people who are white on the outside, but not white inside. I’m not sure what term should be applied to them other than “human beings.” [Exactly. A spiritual person is color blind and sees the soul.]

What I’m putting out here is not a racial proposition but a cultural proposition. Those who ultimately advocate and defend the realities of European culture and its industrialism are my enemies. Those who resist it, who struggle against it, are my allies, the allies of American Indian people. And I don’t give a damn what their skin color happens to be. Caucasian is the white term for the white race: European [Rothschild hegemony coming out of monotheism] is an outlook I oppose.

The Vietnamese Communists are not exactly what you might consider genetic Caucasians, but they are now functioning as mental Europeans. The same holds true for the Chinese Communists, for Japanese capitalists or Bantu Catholics or Peter “MacDollar” down at the Navajo reservation or Dickie Wilson up here at Pine Ridge. There is no racism involved in this, just an acknowledgment of the mind and spirit that make up culture.

In Marxist terms I suppose I’m a “cultural nationalist.” [Which the New World Order hates, and which all of us must become. We must preserve our families.] I work first with my people, the traditional Lakota people, because we hold a common worldview and share an immediate struggle. Beyond this, I work with other traditional American Indian peoples, again because of a certain commonality in worldview and form of struggle. Beyond that, I work with anyone who has experience the colonial oppression of Europe and who resists its cultural and industrial totality. Obviously, this includes genetic Caucasians who struggle to resist the dominant norms of European culture. The Irish and the Basques come immediately to mind, but there are many others.

I work primarily with my own people, with my own community. Other people who hold non-European perspectives should do the same. I believe in the slogan, “Trust your brother’s vision,” although I’d like to add sisters in the bargain. I trust the community and the culturally based vision of all the races that naturally resist industrialization and human extinction. Clearly, individual whites can share in this, given only that they have reached the awareness that continuation of the industrial imperatives of Europe is not a vision, but species suicide. White is one of the sacred colors of the Lakota people — red, yellow, white and black. The four directions. The four seasons. The four period of life and aging. The four races of humanity. Mix red, yellow, white and black together and you get brown, the color of the fifth race. This is the natural order of things. It therefore seems natural to me to work with all races, each with it’s own special meaning, identity and message.

“But there is a peculiar behavior among most Caucasians. As soon as I become critical of Europe and its impact on other cultures, they become defensive. They begin to defend themselves. But I am not attacking them personally; I’m attacking Europe. In personalizing my observations on Europe they are personalizing European culture, identifying themselves with it. By defending themselves in this context, they are ultimately defending the death culture. This is a confusion which must be overcome, and it must be overcome in a hurry. None of us has energy to waste in such false struggles.

“Caucasians have a more positive vision to offer humanity than European culture. I believe this. But in order to attain this vision it is necessary for Caucasians to step outside European [Roth-efeller] culture — alongside the rest of humanity — to see Europe for what it is and what it does.

“To cling to capitalism and Marxism and all the other “isms” is simply to remain within European culture. [The world of mind programming.] There is no avoiding this basic fact. As a fact, this constitutes a choice. Understand that the choice is based on culture, not race! Understand that to choose European culture and industrialism is to choose to be my enemy. And understand that the choice is yours, not mine.

This leads me back to address those American Indians who are drifting through the universities, the city slums, and other European institutions. If you are there to learn to resist the oppressor in accordance with your traditional ways, so be it. I don’t know how you manage to combine the two, but perhaps you will succeed. But retain your sense of reality.

“Beware of coming to believe the white world now offers solutions to the problems it confronts us with. Beware, too, of allowing the words of native people to be twisted to the advantage of our enemies. Europe invented the practice of turning words around on themselves. You need only look to the treaties between American Indian peoples and various European governments to know that this is true. Draw your strength from who you are.

“A culture which regularly confuses revolution with continuation, which confuses science and religion, which confuses revolt with resistance, has nothing helpful to teach you and nothing to offer you as a way of life. Europeans have long since lost all touch with reality, if they ever were in touch with it. Feel sorry for them if you need to, but be comfortable with who you are as American Indians.

“So, I suppose to conclude this, I would state clearly that leading anyone toward Marxism is the last thing on my mind. Marxism is as alien to my culture as capitalism and Christianity are. In fact, I can say I don’t think I’m trying to lead anyone toward anything.

[Exactly. A sovereign person does not make others into followers. Buddha and Jesus were not channelers, they were sovereign beings. Jesus doesn’t want me to follow, he wants me to stand up! Buddha’s dying advice after 40 years of teaching was “Be a light onto yourselves.”]

“To some extent I tried to be a “leader,” in the sense that white media like to use that term, when the American Indian Movement was a young organization. This was a result of a confusion that I no longer have. You

cannot be everything to everyone. [We can not lead others, we only end up leading dumbed down followers. The leader then becomes an icon, no longer human.]

I do not propose to be used in such a fashion by my enemies. I am not a leader. I am an Oglala Lakota patriot. This is all I want and all I need to be.

“And I am very comfortable with who I am.”

Russell Means (1939-2012)


Join the discussion 2 Comments

  • Joey Hart says:

    This speech is brilliant, and when used as a metaphor to describe human social evolution toward mono-culture the speech does indeed force any astute reader to give pause to the worthiness of their own current thinking. Those of us who think we are “awake” and rail at the powers that be while endorsing “free energy”, emergence of a fair, even handed society, and space travel at multiples of the speed of light to join our Universal Siblings among the stars do so without a thought as to the cost to the Earth and her natural balance.
    “progress” actually becomes “digress” and development IS indeed paid for by destruction. It is no wonder that factories and industry mines and areas of extraction are placed far from the madding crowds. If we were to lay eyes on the sad state of the lands that are used for extraction of raw materials to feed production and so foster development it would look as bad to us as a meat packing slaughterhouse which has driven so many to become vegan. When we are proud of the success of corporations such as Tesla, Apple and Google we do not consider the global cost to the Earth nor the fiscal imbalance it helps to foster. The sin of consumerism and love of technology is a globalist ploy. New Age, meditation, spirituality and all the new “isms” lead to a mono-culturist society where the many will still benefit the few.
    Until we re-embrace diversity and respect the cycles of nature in all we do “All roads lead to Rome”. Embracing diversity and the Earth, one by one, each on our own, will end all strife and war. Rather than accumulating wealth and sheer numbers of things all that each of us has that is “extra” should be freely given to those who would use it.
    My own love of technology and space travel is actually selfish. Is it not the same for you? What does any of that accomplish in the large picture other than a joy ride for our pleasure and entertainment? The planet and its flora, fauna and diverse peoples are feeling the pain of violence and want while so many of us are still trying to impress people we don’t know, with things we don’t need, spending money many of us don’t really have by enriching the very banking systems that enslave us.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com